Mind Map¶
Interactive overview of the paper's logical structure. Click and drag to explore.
mindmap
root((Frequent Losers<br/>as Cover Bidders))
**Data**
BEC Platform
Sao Paulo state
2009–2019
4.5M tender-items
41K unique firms
Phases 2 and 3
Convite sealed bid
Pregao e-auction
**FL Definition**
Always-losers
win rate = 0%
16,843 firms
IQR threshold
median + 1.5 x IQR
threshold ~ 14 tenders
2,735 FL firms
Treatment: tender has >= 1 FL
**H1: Screening Marker**
OLS price premium
4–9% higher prices
4 DVs x 4 specs
CADE validation
3.5x overrepresentation
3 of 5 convicted firms
Sensitivity
Oster delta = 3.6
Sensemakr RV = 17.5%
**H2: Cover Bidding**
Instrumental Variables
IGYR shift-share IV
First stage F = 396
21% markup LATE
Bajari-Ye tests
Exchangeability rejected
Independence rejected
Tender FE: coeff 0.38
Network analysis
Competitive > concentrated
FL amplify bid rigging
**Mechanisms**
M1 Selection
+15% genuine firms
M2 Calibration
-4% bids closer to ref
M3 Reverse causality
Elasticity ~ 0
**Robustness**
Threshold sensitivity
IQR multiplier 1.0–2.5
Matching
CEM and IPW
Cross-fitting
DML welfare bounds
DiD
Sun and Abraham
Underpowered MDE 7.8%
Welfare bounds
2.4% of spending
**Policy Implications**
Flag FL participation
Triage suspicious tenders
Investigate patterns
Monitor over time