Skip to content

Main Results

Event Study: Log Prices

The event study plots semester-by-semester differences between group 65 (switched) and other groups (always treated). The parallel trends assumption requires that the difference is stable in the post-period (after March 2018).

Event study: Log prices
Figure 1. Log Prices: Difference between the always treated group and the switched group

The difference between the two groups narrows dramatically after the policy change and then stabilizes in subsequent periods, supporting the parallel trends assumption.

Event study: Distance
Figure A.1. Distance from PBUs to Winner Firms
Event study: Number of firms
Figure A.2. Number of Participant Firms (log)
Event study: Number of bids
Figure A.3. Number of Valid Bids (log)

Descriptive Statistics

Group 65, Pre Group 65, Post Others, Pre Others, Post
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Price (levels) 1,402 20,564 1,508 25,872 1,466 50,386 1,291 68,043
Log price 1.72 2.84 1.91 2.81 2.85 2.12 2.78 2.07
Number of firms 3.17 2.52 3.02 2.40 4.66 3.27 4.69 3.28
Log firms 0.88 0.73 0.84 0.71 1.30 0.72 1.30 0.72
Number of valid bids 11.10 15.49 10.99 16.51 10.13 15.74 10.47 16.87
Log bids 1.64 1.24 1.61 1.23 1.69 1.06 1.70 1.08
Distance (km) 238.54 270.42 215.08 239.63 164.78 182.23 170.28 186.07
N (completed / all) 65,606 77,206 66,822 85,181 246,277 287,500 271,011 323,836

Price and distance computed on completed items. Firm and bid statistics computed on all items.


DiDiR Results: Log Prices

6-month 6-month 12-month 12-month 18-month 18-month
g65 x Pre -0.1311*** -0.1441*** -0.1370*** -0.1369*** -0.1309*** -0.1330***
(0.0121) (0.0116) (0.0107) (0.0104) (0.0096) (0.0094)
Sealed bids -0.1461*** -0.2216*** -0.1430*** -0.2025*** -0.1501*** -0.2048***
(0.0088) (0.0131) (0.0079) (0.0123) (0.0079) (0.0116)
Log quantity -0.2598*** -0.2972*** -0.2611*** -0.2956*** -0.2597*** -0.2934***
(0.0082) (0.0089) (0.0075) (0.0080) (0.0073) (0.0077)
Observations 219,535 219,535 439,054 439,054 649,714 649,714
R-squared 0.191 0.212 0.193 0.211 0.193 0.211
Item FE YES YES YES YES YES YES
PBU FE NO YES NO YES NO YES

Standard errors clustered at the item level. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1.

Negotiated prices are 4.6--8.1% lower in group 65 open tenders across all specifications and time windows.


DiDiR Results: Number of Participant Firms

6-month 6-month 12-month 12-month 18-month 18-month
g65 x Pre 0.1776*** 0.1821*** 0.1495*** 0.1540*** 0.0926*** 0.1004***
(0.0079) (0.0081) (0.0062) (0.0063) (0.0059) (0.0060)
Observations 261,450 261,450 524,745 524,745 773,263 773,263
R-squared 0.214 0.167 0.210 0.165 0.206 0.163
Item FE YES YES YES YES YES YES
PBU FE NO YES NO YES NO YES

Standard errors clustered at the item level. *** p<0.01.

Open tenders attract ~22% more firms in the short term, attenuating to ~10% in the 18-month window.


Heterogeneous Effects by Item Value

Log prices Log firms Log bids Distance
Panel A: High-value items (above median)
g65 x Pre -0.1369*** 0.1075*** 0.0456*** 12.0849***
(0.0103) (0.0072) (0.0093) (2.9018)
Observations 383,949 445,903 445,903 383,949
Panel B: Low-value items (below median)
g65 x Pre -0.0981*** 0.0592*** 0.0577*** 2.8312
(0.0086) (0.0075) (0.0110) (2.2944)
Observations 265,765 327,360 327,360 265,765

18-month window, base specification. Sample split at median reference value.

The price effect is 40% larger for high-value items (-0.137 vs. -0.098). The distance effect is significant only for high-value items (12.1 km).


Fiscal Cost Quantification

Translating the estimated price effects into monetary terms provides a concrete measure of the policy's fiscal burden. The calculation applies the implied percentage price effect (\(e^{\hat{\beta}} - 1\)) to the total procurement value of group 65 completed items in the pre-period (Sep 2016--Feb 2018).

Component Baseline spec. PBU FE spec.
Price coefficient (18m) -0.1309 -0.1330
Implied price effect -12.27% -12.45%
G65 pre-period total value R$ 689.0 million R$ 689.0 million
Estimated fiscal saving R$ 84.5 million R$ 85.8 million

R$ 84.5--85.8 million Fiscal cost of restricting tenders to SMEs for group 65 in the pre-period (18-month window, ~US$17 million)

This represents about 12% of total procurement value for group 65. The estimate is conservative: group 65 accounts for only 27% of total BEC procurement, so the aggregate fiscal cost across all product groups subject to SME restrictions is likely several times larger. The heterogeneity results further indicate that these costs are disproportionately concentrated among high-value items.


Raw trends: prices
Figure A.4. Raw Trends: Mean Log Price by Month
Raw trends: firms
Figure A.5. Raw Trends: Mean Log Number of Firms by Month
Raw trends: bids
Figure A.6. Raw Trends: Mean Log Number of Valid Bids by Month
Raw trends: distance
Figure A.7. Raw Trends: Mean Distance (km) by Month
SME participation share
Figure A.9. SME Participation Share Among Firms by Month